[Wyewood] Input Requested from Our Populace - Reply requested by noon Friday 8/25

[Tim Geyer]

The customary says that the champion shall run the tournament to choose their successor and be present when their successor is invested.  That wording seems to be clear that they cannot succeed themselves.  If you run the tournament then you should not compete out of fairness.

If we want to change that for the future we need to change the customary.

I don't like the idea of champions succeeding themselves, but if our branch decides to allow that then I agree that we need clearly defined term limits.

YIS
Tymme "Prodkiller" Lytefelow 

-----Original Message-----
From: "dragonfly--- via Wyewood" <wyewood at lists.wyewood.org>
Sent: ‎8/‎23/‎2017 8:47 AM
To: "Wyewood_eList" <wyewood at lists.wyewood.org>
Cc: "Coronets-Wyewood" <coronets at wyewood.org>
Subject: Re: [Wyewood] Input Requested from Our Populace - Reply requested by noon Friday 8/25

I do not believe that Champion should be a position that is held for long
periods of time by a single individual.  If the decision is made to allow
a champion to serve for more than one consecutive term, I feel that the
maximum number of possible consecutive terms needs to be specified.
Calote
dragonfly at w-link.net

_______________________________________________
Wyewood mailing list
Wyewood at lists.wyewood.org
http://lists.wyewood.org/listinfo.cgi/wyewood-wyewood.org