[Officers] [Wyewood] Officers meeting. November 8

[Wendi Dunlap]

Hi all,

I think these questions should probably be discussed openly. Sebastian has legitimate concerns here.

Wenyeva



On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Tomas G wrote:

> Replied off-list
> 
> Tomas
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian ffraser Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 3:39 PM To: Tomas G ; Wyewood Officers Subject: Re: [Wyewood] Officers meeting. November 8 
> Tomas,
> 
> I am still waiting to hear the answers to the 7 questions I asked
> regarding the FCS location.
> 
> In addition, I would like to know why the officers are controlling the
> communication flow of the shire, by restricting comments, questions,
> and criticisms on our open list?
> Which supplants my rights as a member of the society to have an open
> conversation with other members of the branch.
> 
> And why the officers are making all decisions for the branch with out
> the consultation of the populace prior to the decision being made?
> The purpose of the officers meeting is to insure that all the officers
> have their reports in order, hold financial committee meetings, and to
> ensure that the officers are in general agreement on actions and
> events within the shire.
> The meetings were not designed, nor intended, to replace the business
> meeting, but to supplement it.
> 
> If the officers want to use the Officers meeting as the Business
> meeting, then that is fine, but the populace should be notified, the
> term Officers meeting should be replaced, and it should be made clear
> that that meeting is where the Shire's business will be decided.
> 
> 
> Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> Officers mailing list
> Officers at lists.wyewood.org
> http://lists.wyewood.org/listinfo.cgi/officers-wyewood.org



\-\ Wenyeva atte grene * "In tenebris lux" 
 \-\ Armorum Servula, quam Ancoram Caeruleam dicunt
  \-\ Per chevron argent and vert, three beacons counterchanged.